-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=. harassment at work -=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Once I stopped watching television and listening to. the radio at the end
of
1990, "they" had to find other. ways of committing abuses. So they took
what
must be for them a tried and tested route; they. get at you by subversion
of
those around you. Since they wouldn't be able to do that. with my family
or
friends, that meant getting at people in the workplace to. be their
mouthpieces and do. their dirty work for them.
They. supplied my employers in Oxford with details from what was going on
in
my private life, and what I and other people had said at my. home and
accommodation in Oxford. So people at work repeated. verbatim words which
had been said in my home, and repeated what I'd been. doing recently.
Often
the most trivial things, the ones from your. domestic life, are the ones
which hurt most. One manager in particular at Oxford continuously. abused
me
for ten months with verbal ***ual abuse, swearing, and threats to.
terminate
my employment. After ten months I was forced to seek psychiatric. help and
start taking medication, and. was away from work for two months. I spoke
later. with a solicitor about what had happened at that company; he
advised
it was only possible. to take action if you had left the company as a
result
of harassment, and such an action would have to be. started very soon
after
leaving.
Over a year later the. same manager picked on another new worker, with
even
more serious results; that employee tried to. commit suicide with an
overdose as a result of the ill-treatment, and was forced to. leave his
job.
But he didn't take action against the company, either. Abuse at. work is
comparable to that elsewhere. in that tangible evidence is difficult to
produce, and the abusers will always have. their denials ready when
challenged. And. even if a court accepts what you say happened, it still
remains. to prove that abuse causes the type of breakdown I had at the end
of 1992. In a recent case before a British court, a former. member of the
Army brought a case against others who had maltreated. him ten years
previously. Although the court accepted that abuse had occurred, it. did
not
agree that. depressive illness necessarily followed, and denied justice to
the. plaintiff.
2590
|
